Saturday, August 3, 2013

Retail Industry Adds 37,000 Jobs in July


Note to media: Retail Insight Center

For Immediate Release
Stephen E. Schatz (202) 626-8119
SchatzS@NRF.com

NRF: Retail Industry Adds 37,000 Jobs in July

Washington, August 2, 2013 ? The National Retail Federation today issued the following statements from President and CEO Matthew Shay and Chief Economist Jack Kleinhenz on the July employment numbers. NRF pegged retail job gains at 37,000 in July, with increases in general merchandise, food and beverage and building and garden supply stores.

?In spite of continued rancor and uncertainty from policymakers in Washington, the private sector economy continues to add jobs,? NRF President and CEO Matthew Shay said. ?While unemployment remains stubbornly high, with millions of Americans jobless or underemployed, retailers are adding to their ranks and payrolls.?

?Contrary to the record increases on Wall Street, employment continues to be a lagging indicator of the recovering economy,? NRF Chief Economist Jack Kleinhenz said. ?Despite the underwhelming and discouraging job gains in July, NRF expects the economy to pick up in the third and fourth quarters. The employment trend is positive, yet lackluster.?

The Bureau of Labor Statistics report today showed that the economy added 162,000 jobs in July, which lowered the unemployment rate to 7.4 percent.

As the world?s largest retail trade association and the voice of retail worldwide, NRF represents retailers of all types and sizes, including chain restaurants and industry partners, from the United States and more than 45 countries abroad. Retailers operate more than 3.6 million U.S. establishments that support one in four U.S. jobs ? 42 million working Americans. Contributing $2.5 trillion to annual GDP, retail is a daily barometer for the nation?s economy. NRF?s This is Retail campaign highlights the industry?s opportunities for life-long careers, how retailers strengthen communities, and the critical role that retail plays in driving innovation. www.nrf.com

###

?

Source: http://feeds.nrf.com/~r/NRFNews/~3/bq8EAIgxcQ0/nrfpressnews~Retail-Industry-Adds-Jobs-in-July.php

American flag Happy 4th of July Laura Elizabeth Whitehurst al jazeera Armie Hammer Aaryn Gries Cop Shoots Dog

Friday, August 2, 2013

SEGA's Total War: Rome II is large and in charge

'Total War: Rome II', a strategy computer game from SEGA.

They say that good things come to those who wait. ?Well, by that logic those who have been waiting for the sequel to PC game Total War: Rome?should expect great things from Total War: Rome II. ?After all, they've been waiting nine years for the darn thing.

Good or bad, players can be certain of one thing right out of the box: ?Rome II?is big. ?Really big.

"It's the biggest game we've ever made," said Studio Communications Manager?Al Bickham during a behind-closed-doors presentation of the game last week.

In fact (just in terms of the game map itself), players will find that it goes as far north as Scotland, down through the Mediterannian, from Portugal on the West through to the Middle East. ?Compared to that of developer Creative Assembly's previous game, Total War: Shogun 2, the game is enormous.

"The campaign map for?Rome II?- you know, the kind of turn based part of the game where the game of statecraft and expansion and diplomacy - that campaign map is huge," stated Bickham during a post-presentation one-on-one interview. ?"It's four times the size of?Shogun 2?in terms of scale."

In addition to having a vastly larger campaign map, Rome II?also offers a greater diversity in its units. ?Shogun 2?had some 40 different military units to command. ?Rome II?has in excess of 700.

But simply being large is one thing. ?Being good is something else entirely. ?Luckily, after having some hands-on time with an early build of the game, it seems that CA is doing just fine on that front as well. ?It's not perfect, but the game still has a little of development time left before it comes out in a little more than a month to work out the few remaining kinks.

A few technical caveats aside, Rome II?looks to be every bit the Total War?gameplay experience the franchise is known for and more. ?And the use of the word "more" is as figurative as it is literal.

In addition to simply winning battles (something easier stated than accomplished), players can also find victory in other avenues. ?This includes the ability to win by having a vastly superior culture to the game's many other factions. ?The game can also be won through economics. ?These win conditions are a little more Sid Meier's Civilization-like than Total War?players might be comfortable with, but CA seemed very happy the additions.

Another item easily noticed during play is the game's graphical presentation. ?While not exactly awe-striking on an item-by-item basis, the sheer scale of what the game has to render coupled with how good everything looks overall is quite impressive both in battle and out. ?It's of Bickham's opinion that the depth and detail found in Rome II (both visually and otherwise) are a couple of the things that will make the game stand out against its predecessors and others similar to it.

"We support that by letting the player get right up close when those big real-time battles happen with 40,000 guys clashing on ancient battlefields," he commented. ?"You know, you get the camera down there close and you can see each individual man fighting and they've got such a vast range of combat animations and it looks absolutely incredible."

Still, the Studio Communications Manager stated that gamers don't need a top-tier rig in order for Rome II?to be played.

"Our aim all along was to not shift the minimum spec of grade of PC you need to play it from?Shogun 2," he said. ?"We've pretty much hitting that; we're close to?Shogun 2's minimum spec."

Bickham then continued,?"But of course, if you've got a monster PC with two enormous graphics cards and a super-fast processor, we'll take every bit of power you can give us and give you the most visually stunning artistic experience you've ever seen."

Those looking to get their latest Total War?fix will be able to do so when SEGA launches the PC exclusive on the 3ds of September.

The ESRB has rated Total War: Rome II?as "T for Teen".

News10/KXTV

Source: http://www.news10.net/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=252548

College Football Scoreboard nfl scores nfl scores Devon Walker Tom Cruise ryan reynolds Star Trek: The Original Series

Ipswich Business over Breakfast (BoB Club), Last Anchor Bar and ...

This successful business networking club in Ipswich meets every two weeks on a Tuesday. For those of you who may have tried networking before and felt under pressure to refer each week, try BoB Networking as we concentrate on quality referrals rather than quantity at our meetings. So come along and try our lively group and learn more about how Networking through BoB clubs can help both you and your business.

Event Organised By

Business over Breakfast (BoB) Clubs

www.bobclubs.com

BoB Clubs creates a secure and successful networking environment for members to cooperate and exchange referrals. Members actively seek and create opportunities for each other.

You and your business will thrive during your professionally structured meetings where you feel welcome, trusted and respected, whilst building confidence and potential business and profits.

You are encouraged to focus on quality referrals, not quantity, leaving you free to network without any undue pressure.

Constant support is on hand to help you save time, earn more money.

Interested in Running your Own Business over Breakfast (BoB) Clubs Event?

Raise the profile of your own business, among other benefits, by organising business networking events in your local area.

Opportunities currently exist with Business over Breakfast (BoB) Clubs to run their events in various UK locations. Click below for further information.

Tell me more about Running My Own Events!


Attending this event or want to share it on Facebook? Comment below!

Source: http://www.findnetworkingevents.com/events/index.cfm?action=eventdetail&eventid=60145&utm_source=sitefeeds&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=regionfeed

Justin Timberlake Grammys jessica biel Lena Dunham elton john weather nyc national signing day Solomon Islands

White House 'extremely disappointed' with Russia

White House press secretary Jay Carney speaks during the daily briefing at the White House in Washington, Thursday, Aug. 1, 2013. Carney was asked about National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden who left the transit zone of a Moscow airport and officially entered Russia after authorities granted him asylum for a year, his lawyer said. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

White House press secretary Jay Carney speaks during the daily briefing at the White House in Washington, Thursday, Aug. 1, 2013. Carney was asked about National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden who left the transit zone of a Moscow airport and officially entered Russia after authorities granted him asylum for a year, his lawyer said. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

WASHINGTON (AP) ? A highly anticipated fall summit between President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin could become a casualty of Moscow's defiant decision to grant temporary asylum to National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden, the White House signaled Thursday after weeks of pressuring and pleading for his return to face prosecution.

Russia's decision "is not a positive development," White House spokesman Jay Carney said.

"We are extremely disappointed that the Russian government would take this step despite our very clear and lawful requests in public and in private to have Mr. Snowden expelled to the United States to face the charges against him," Carney said.

Obama is scheduled to go to Russia in September for the Group of 20 economic summit in St. Petersburg and also stop in Moscow for one-on-one talks Putin. The White House alternately has demanded that Russia return Snowden while also saying it doesn't want his case to negatively impact relations with Moscow.

Asked whether Obama would still travel to Moscow, Carney said pointedly, "We are evaluating the utility of a summit."

There was a strong reaction from some lawmakers.

"Russia's action today is a disgrace and a deliberate effort to embarrass the United States. It is a slap in the face of all Americans," Republican Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said in a joint statement. "Now is the time to fundamentally rethink our relationship with Putin's Russia."

The senators suggested expanding U.S. sanctions against Russians accused of human rights violations, completing U.S. missile defense programs based in Europe, and moving quickly on another round of NATO expansion to include the Republic of Georgia.

A top Democrat, Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, said Obama should recommend moving the G-20 summit. Long before Thursday's decision, Graham suggested the U.S. boycott the Winter Olympics taking place next year in Sochi, Russia.

"Russia has stabbed us in the back, and each day that Mr. Snowden is allowed to roam free is another twist of the knife," Schumer said.

Carney declined to speculate about what steps, if any, the U.S. might take in response. He noted the complicated and wide-ranging relationship between the two countries and suggested the U.S. also is reluctant to let Snowden's status become the source of further deterioration.

The U.S. and Russia already disagree on a host of issues, including the civil war in Syria, where Moscow is one of Syrian President Bashar Assad's key supporters and the U.S. is backing anti-Assad rebel forces.

"There is no question that there are a range of issues, setting aside the disposition of Mr. Snowden, on which we are currently in disagreement with Russia," Carney said.

Snowden left the transit zone of a Moscow airport and officially entered Russia after authorities granted him asylum for one year, his lawyer said Thursday. Snowden had been camped out at the airport for more than a month since he arrived there from Hong Kong on June 23.

The U.S. had demanded that Russia send him home to face prosecution for revealing details about secret U.S. electronic surveillance programs. But the two countries have no extradition treaty and Putin dismissed the requests, despite saying he didn't want the Snowden issue to hamper relations with the U.S.

Carney said the U.S. was not told of the decision ahead of time.

Andrew Weiss, a former director of Russian affairs in the Clinton administration, said the Russians had sought an Obama visit so they could portray Putin as an important player on the world stage. But he said it now seems "all but inevitable" that Obama will have to cancel at least part of his trip to Russia in response.

"So something they really wanted, which was the president of the United States there in Moscow, now seems to be in jeopardy" because of Snowden, Weiss said.

Jeffery Mankoff, deputy director and fellow with the Russia and Eurasia program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the meeting should go on because of the other important issues on the table.

"All of these things are kind of sitting there in the bilateral relationship and really need a top-level push to get anywhere," Mankoff said. "Having that kind of meeting would be conducive to getting some of that agenda moving."

___

Associated Press writer Sagar Meghani contributed to this report.

___

Follow Darlene Superville on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/dsuperville

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/cae69a7523db45408eeb2b3a98c0c9c5/Article_2013-08-01-US-NSA-Surveillance-Snowden-Reaction/id-79351620cbbb4c97816b0848c1151666

chris cooley condoleezza rice bill cosby Perry Hall High School Hurricane Isaac 2012 bill nye Snooki Baby

Salad-tied outbreak widespread, source not pegged

LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) ? Food safety advocates are sounding an alarm at the lack of information being disseminated about an enduring intestinal illness tied to prepackaged salad that has sickened nearly 400 people nationwide.

The outbreak of the rare parasite cyclospora has been reported in at least 15 states, and federal officials warned Wednesday it was too early to say it is over.

But if you're looking to find out exactly where it came from, you may be out of luck.

Health officials in Nebraska and Iowa say they've traced cases there to prepackaged salad. They haven't revealed the company that packaged the salad or where it was sold, explaining only that most if not all of it wasn't grown locally.

The lack of information has fueled concern from consumers and others who argue companies should be held accountable when outbreaks happen and customers need the information about where outbreaks came from to make smart food choices.

"If you want the free market to work properly, then you need to let people have the information they need to make informed decisions," said Bill Marler, a Seattle attorney who specializes in class-action food-safety lawsuits.

Heath authorities in California, which provides much of the nation's leafy green produce, said Wednesday the state had not received any reports of cyclospora cases.

"Based on the most currently available information, the leafy greens being implicated in this outbreak were not grown or processed in California," added spokesman Corey Egel in a statement to the Associated Press.

Mark Hutson, who owns a Save-Mart grocery story in Lincoln, Neb., said the lack of specific brand information threatened to hurt all providers, including the good actors.

"I think there was so little information as to what was causing the problem, that people just weren't sure what to do," he said. "Frankly, we would prefer to have the names out there."

Authorities said they still hadn't determined whether the cases of cyclospora in the different states are connected.

"It's too early to say for sure whether it's over, and thus too early to say there's no risk of still getting sick," said Mar?a-Bel?n Moran, spokeswoman for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Only Iowa and Nebraska officials had directly linked the outbreak in their states to a salad mix of iceberg and romaine lettuce, carrots and red cabbage.

Still, grocery shoppers far from known outbreak areas acknowledged it was a factor as they shopped for produce.

"I can't say I really want to go and buy particularly any lettuce right now," said Laura Flanagan, 35, who was shopping at a Whole Foods in Dallas with her two young children. "I'm being pretty cautious about it."

The product was widely distributed in Iowa by wholesalers who could have supplied the bagged salad mix to all types of food establishments, including restaurants and grocery stores, said Iowa Food and Consumer Safety Bureau chief Steven Mandernach.

Mandernach said at least 80 percent of the vegetables were grown and processed outside both Iowa and Nebraska. He said officials haven't confirmed the origins of 20 percent and may never know because victims can't always remember what they ate.

Iowa law allows public health officials to withhold the identities of any person or business affected by an outbreak. However, business names can be released to the public if the state epidemiologist or public health director determines that disclosing the information is needed to protect public safety.

Mandernach said there is no immediate threat, so his office is not required to release information about where the product came from. He said state officials believe the affected salad already has spoiled and is no longer in the supply chain.

Nebraska public health officials said they still hadn't traced the exact origins of the outbreaks.

"I am by no means giving all-clear, green light on the issue," said Dr. Joseph Acierno, the state's chief medical officer and director of public health. "We're encouraging the medical community to stay vigilant."

Food-safety and consumer advocates say the agencies shouldn't withhold the information.

"It's not clear what the policy is, and at the very least they owe it to us to explain why they come down this way," said Sandra Eskin, director of the Pew Charitable Trusts' food safety project. "I think many people wonder if this is all because of possible litigation."

Marler said withholding the information can create general fears that damage the reputation of good actors in food production. He said consumers should be allowed to decide for themselves whether to shop and grocery stores or eat at restaurants where tainted produce was sold.

Some states also are slow to interview infected people, he said, which reduces the chances that they remember where they ate.

The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday that it didn't have enough information to name a possible source of the outbreak. In the past, the agencies have at times declined to ever name a source of an outbreak, referring to "Restaurant A" or using vague terms.

Caroline Smith DeWaal of the Center for Science in the Public Interest says that the decision to withhold a company's name may not only hurt consumers but the food industry, as well. When an item is generally implicated but officials give few specifics, like with the bagged salad, people may stop buying the product altogether.

"I think consumers need more information to make good buying decisions," she said.

Responsibility for disclosing the names of businesses involved general falls to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration because their authority crosses state lines, said Doug Farquhar, a program director with the National Conference of State Legislatures. Farquhar said most states have laws that prohibit the disclosure of businesses that are affected by a foodborne illness.

"In some cases, states go 'rogue' and release the names without FDA approval, in the name of public safety," Farquhar said. "But for the most part, states prefer to let the FDA release the names and take the heat.

___

Associated Press writers Uriel Garcia in Dallas and Gosia Wozniacka in Fresno, Calif., contributed to this report.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/salad-tied-outbreak-widespread-source-not-pegged-070835989.html

ll cool j Presidents Day 2013 jack white wiz khalifa 2013 Grammys kelly clarkson Lumineers

Thursday, August 1, 2013

5 big challenges for Google Glass

Google Glass, for all its promise, has some scary implications. Here is my list of 5 potential challenges we face with Glass:

  • User Experience
  • Social Awkwardness
  • Privacy (or lack thereof)
  • Obsession
  • Humanity

1. User Experience

It?s early days right now, so I don?t want to harp on too much about UX challenges, but there are a few worth mentioning, not least how I can walk up to someone and start controlling their device by simply uttering: ?OK Glass.? Yikes.

Some other notable growing pains:

  • It?s really hard to see the screen in daylight
  • Looking up and to the right (where the screen is located) can hurt your eyes after a while
  • Don?t try to drive with Glass on.? Trust me on this one
  • The voice commands are limited and you have to say things exactly how Glass expects them
  • The volume is quite low ? rather than using an ear bud, Glass uses bone conduction
  • Short battery life

Survival tip: Hang tight. These are all things that Google has some or full control over, so we can expect improvements consistently over time as the engineers learn and the components become more advanced.?

There?s nothing really damaging or fearful about the user experience of Glass; in fact, for an alpha release of a product category that didn?t exist 12 months ago, it?s extremely impressive.

2. Social Awkwardness

Have you ever tried having a conversation with someone who is wearing Glass? It's really unpleasant. Is the thing on? Are they recording me? Are they checking their email? It's just...obnoxious.

Hilarious, but not far from reality.

The ungainliness will likely subside as Glass gets smaller and more obscure - eventually fitting inconspicuously in the frames of your Ray-Ban?s - but that will just amplify the angst of not knowing whether you're being recorded or completely ignored.? At least with iPhones, it's completely obvious when someone isn?t paying attention.

Survival tip: Just as we?re learning that sometimes we need to turn our phones off when we want to be fully present, we?re going to need to take off or turn off Glass. ?OK Glass, don?t interrupt me or even let me know you?re here unless it?s the zombie apocalypse.?

3. Privacy (or lack thereof)

Have you ever done or said something stupid at a party or other social setting?? No?? Well, everyone else in the world has. And, for most of us, those moments are gone forever. As they should be. Maybe they're committed to our own memory, but they're not lurking on a hard drive waiting to go viral.

Inevitably the battery life of Glass will enable 24/7 recording with data streamed instantly into the cloud for storage and replication. Combine this with the rapid advancements in facial recognition and privacy and anonymity are out the door.

So how do we hide from Glass?

Survival tip: Accept that you cannot hide. We can barely hide now from the gadgets we have, especially in public places. If you think about it, any time a number of people in a contained area get together, the chances that someone will record some part of the proceedings is pretty high. We are adapting. Hopefully the positive outcomes (identifying miscreants or missing children) will outweigh the negative ones (privacy violations and extortion).

4. Obsession

Will we ever turn Google Glass off, or will we become one with our devices, science fiction-style?

At Varonis, we?re fascinated with digital collaboration, work habits, and human-computer interaction, because our software helps make those things safer by protecting sensitive information from those who shouldn?t have access to it. We?ve done a number of research reports on these topics and they all support the hypothesis that many of us are becoming obsessed:

  • 86% of people surveyed consider themselves device obsessed or ?always on?
  • 44% use their devices during meals
  • 20% consider themselves borderline workaholics
  • 15% bring their work devices on vacation

Survival tip: Again, turn it off! Glass is the ultimate multi-tasking device. While we might feel like we?re being more productive by doing many things at once, there are rapidly diminishing returns. Studies show that the human brain is terrible at multi-tasking.? So we will have to be disciplined about turning Google Glass off, not only for the sake of our own personal productivity, but for the sanity of the people we interact with.

5. Humanity

We shouldn?t let technology be a substitute for acting human. Wearable technology like Glass, which is omnipresent and entangled with our consciousness, has a strong potential for distancing us from human interaction.?

A quick personal story.

After college, I scraped together enough money to backpack through Europe for a bit. It was my first time outside of my native US. My first time on a plane, even. Buckingham Palace, the Louvre, St. Peter?s cathedral, the Colosseum - I was gulping down experiences one by one, with my own eyes and ears.? I took my fair share of photos, but I recall seeing droves of tourists walking through St. Peter?s glued to the glowing screens of their video cameras. They were capturing everything, but experiencing nothing.

As much as I adore technology, I?m grateful that I didn?t have an iPhone on that trip.? And imagining my trip, or my daughter?s graduation, through Google Glass honestly makes me a bit queasy.?

Blogger Jason Calacanis has an extreme viewpoint: ?The space between you and me is sacred. It?s the last sacred place we have left, and Google Glass destroys it. There?s no social norm that will solve it.?

I think that?s taking it too far. I think many of us are capable of balance.

Survival tip: Be balanced.? There will be times where Google Glass will greatly enhance life. But there will be plenty of times when you and your friends and family would be far better served if you?d just shut the thing off. Follow Google?s own motto here: Don?t Be Evil. And don?t be rude. Be present for your loved ones.

OK, Glass: save and close blog post.

Rob Sobers is Director at security firm Varonis

Top image: Flickr (infocux Technologies)

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/itproportal/rss/~3/IXPVh1VZlgg/

pennsylvania primary jerome simpson hand sanitizer obama on jimmy fallon pilar sanders andrew young real life barbie

Edwin Moses running for WADA president

LONDON (AP) ? Former Olympic hurdles great Edwin Moses is a candidate to become the next president of the World Anti-Doping Agency.

The IOC says the two-time Olympic gold medalist in the 400-meter hurdles submitted his candidacy last week.

Moses is the third candidate to enter the race, joining IOC vice president Craig Reedie of Britain and former IOC medical director Patrick Schamasch of France.

Moses, who won gold medals in 1976 and 1984, has been active in the anti-doping movement since retiring from competition. He is currently chairman of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency.

The IOC executive board will put forward one candidate for the WADA presidency at its meeting in Moscow on Aug. 9.

It's up to the Olympic movement to nominate a successor to former Australian minister John Fahey, who steps down in November after six years in the job.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/edwin-moses-running-wada-president-103918074.html

mickelson how to tie a tie sweet potato recipes the sound of music celebration church new york auto show 2012 tulsa